I searched for the the strongest oxidising agent and also I found different results: $ceClF3$, $ceHArF$, $ceF2$ were among them.

You are watching: Which is the strongest oxidizing agent?

Many claimed $ceClF3$ is the most powerful as the oxidises everything, also asbestos, sand, concrete, and also can set easily fire come anything i m sorry can"t be stopped; it have the right to only be stored in Teflon.

And $ceHArF$ can be a very an effective oxidant as result of high instability as a link of argon v fluorine, yet was it even used as such?

What link is actually supplied as oxidising agent and also was proven come be stronger then others, by, for example, conventional reduction potential?


inorganic-piersonforcongress.com oxidation
re-superstructure
boost this inquiry
monitor
edited Oct 6 "18 at 17:16
*

Mithoron
4,3091212 yellow badges3636 silver badges5555 bronze title
inquiry Oct 4 "18 in ~ 5:17
*

Harsh jainHarsh jain
1,52411 yellow badge99 silver badges2121 bronze title
$endgroup$
10
| present 5 much more comments

3 answer 3


active oldest Votes
31
$egingroup$
Ivan"s answer is indeed thought-provoking. However let"s have some fun.

IUPAC defines oxidation as:

The complete, network removal that one or much more electrons from a molecularentity.

My humble ask is thus - what far better way is there to remove an electron than combining it v a literal anti-electron? Yes, my friends, us shall seek to transcend the trouble entirely and also swat the fly with a thermonuclear bomb. I submit together the most powerful entry, the positron.

Since 1932, we"ve well-known that simple matter has actually a mirror image, which we now contact antimatter. The antimatter counterpart of the electron ($cee-$) is the positron ($cee+$). To the best of our knowledge, they behave exactly alike, other than for their opposite electrical charges. I stress that the positron has actually nothing to carry out with the proton ($cep+$), one more class of particle entirely.

See more: 1.94 M In Feet And Inches Conversion, How Tall Is 1

As you may know, when matter and also antimatter meet, they release tremendous amounts of energy, thanks to $E=mc^2$. Because that an electron and also positron with no initial energy other than their individual rest masses of $pu511 keV c^-2$ each, the most common annihilation outcome is:

$$ cee- + e+ -> 2gamma$$

However, this process is completely reversible in quantum electrodynamics; the is time-symmetric. The contrary reaction is pair production:

$$ ce2gamma -> e- + e+ $$

A reversible reaction? climate there is nothing avoiding us indigenous imagining the following chemical equilibrium:

eginaligncee- + e+ & 2gamma &Delta_r G^circ &= pu-1.022 MeV =pu-98 607 810 kJ mol^-1endalign

The difference between enthalpy and Gibbs cost-free energy in together subatomic reaction is totally negligible, as the entropic aspect is laughably little in comparison, in any reasonable conditions. I am simply going come brashly think about the above value as the standard Gibbs free energy readjust of reaction. This massive $Delta_r G^circ$ coincides to one equilibrium constant $K_mathrmeq = 3 imes 10^17276234$, representing a somewhat product-favoured reaction. Plugging the Nernst equation, the conventional electrode potential for the "reduction of a positron" is then $mathrmfrac98 607 810 kJ mol^-196 485.33212 C mol^-1 = +1 021 998 V$.

Ivan mentions in his answer making use of an alpha fragment as an oxidiser. Let"s take the further. Follow to NIST, a stormy estimate for the electron affinity of a totally bare darmstadtium cell core ($ceDs^110+$) is $pu-204.4 keV$, so also a stripped superheavy atom can"t complement the oxidising strength of a positron!