*

Question indigenous Darcy:

When you acquisition a "bundle" of lumber at the store, the is significant 0.75 cubic feet. What is the formula for figuring out that measurement because that cubic feet and what fraction of a true cord of wood (128 cubic feet) is it. I would appreciate the formula so ns can construct a spreadsheet to help my secretaries and myself it is in in compliance to the regulation when marketing firewood. Thanks.

You are watching: How many pieces of wood in a bundle

Hi Darcy,

If every bundle to be 1 cubic foot it would take 128 of them to do a cord for this reason each would certainly be one, one hundred and twenty-eighth of a cord.

If each bundle to be 2 cubic foot it would take 128/2= 64 of lock to make a cord so each would be one sixty 4th of a cord.

If each bundle was 0.5 cubic feet it would certainly take 128/0.5 = 256 of lock to do a cord therefore each would be one, two hundred and fifty-sixth of a cord.

If each bundle to be 0.75 cubic feet it would take 128/0.75 = 171 of castle to do a cord so each would certainly be one, one hundred and also seventy-first that a cord.

I"m no sure exactly how the seller came down on 0.75 cubic feet in a bundle. If the sticks room all roughly the same length you could tie castle in a bundle to kind a unstable cylinder and also then approximate the volume together the volume of a cylinder which is π r2 h where π = 3.14, r is the radius that the cylinder

in feet and also h is the size of the pole in feet.

Harley

Darcy created back

Thanks so lot for the response. Ns have uncovered on the web that a formula to number a cord (4 x 4 x 8) is length x height x width however my "answers" execute not make sense. (For instance - the "answer" to 15" x 11" x 28" = 4,620.00. Do I "move" the decimal point out to do it .462 cubic feet? The "bundles" in the store list the "bundle" as having actually 0.75 cubic feet. There are (6) pieces of hardwood in your bundles. There are everywhere from (24) to (28) piece of timber in ours "stack" and also they measure the end so much much more than the keep bundles. Check out my quandary?

Specifically various other than 24 cubic feet (1/2 the a traditional pickup van - portion of a cord?) and also 48 cubic feet (1 entire standard pickup truck fraction of a cord?), we offer a "volume" of: length of log, 15" x 11" elevation of logs stacked together x 28" width of logs stack together. How plenty of cubic feet in the "bundle" - we speak to them "stacks" because instead of bundling them up in plastic (which would most likely not it is in recycled), human being pick them increase in their cars together a "stack" that wood. The Dept. Of Weights and Measures has instructed us to "do the math" and also either brand them in cubic feet or label them together a portion of a cord.

Hi again Darcy,

The measurement size × width × height does offer you the volume yet if you want the systems to it is in cubic feet you need the dimensions in feet. There space 12 inches in a foot for this reason 15 inches is 15/12 feet, 11 customs is 11/12 feet and also 28 inch is 28/12 feet. Thus the volume of your stack is

15/12 × 11/12 × 28/12 = 2.67 cubic feet

which is an extremely close to 22/3 cubic feet.

Notice that 2.67/0.75 = 3.6 so mine calculation offers your stacks as around 3.6 bundles. You claimed that a bundle has actually 6 pieces and also a stack has 24 come 28 pieces and also 24/6 = 4 so every stack is 4 or an ext bundles. At the very least we space in the very same "ball park".

For your truck loads, a cord is 128 cubic feet, a typical pickup is 48 cubic feet and 3 × 48 = 144 so 3 truck lots is somewhat more than a cord. Thus a truck fill is a little more than a 3rd of a cord and fifty percent a truck load is a little more than a 6th of a cord. Come be an ext precise a truckload is 48/128 = 0.375 and hence a truckload is 0.375 that a cord.

See more: Number Of Electrons In Magnesium Ion Have? Representing Positive Ions

I hope this helps,Harley

*
*
Math main is sustained by the college of Regina and also The Pacific Institute for the mathematical Sciences.