Dr. Ricdifficult F.W. BaderProfessor of Chemisattempt / piersonforcongress.com College / Hamilton,Ontario
*
Preface
1.

You are watching: Ability of an atom to attract electrons

TheNature of the Problem
2.TheNew Physics
3.TheHydrogen Atom
4.Many-ElectronAtoms
5.ElectronicBasis for the Properties of the Elements
6.TheChemical Bond
7.Ionic and also CovalentBinding
Introduction
Classificationof Chemical Bonds
MolecularCharge Distribution of Homonuclear Diatomic Molecules
DipoleMoments and Polar Bonds
Electronegativity
InteractionBetween Molecules
LiteratureReferences
FurtherReading
Problems
Appendix
8.

See more: What Happens If The Discriminant Is Less Than Zero, What Does This Mean?

MolecularOrbitals
Tableof Contour Values
Electronegativity It is crucial that we be able to predict the extentto which electronic charge will be moved from one atom to anotherin the development of a chemical bond, that is, to predict its polarity.The extremely comprehensive results given previously for the charge distributionsof the diatomic hydrides are not generally easily accessible and also there is a needfor an empirical method which will certainly enable us to estimate the polarity ofany chemical bond. It is feasible to specify for an aspect a residential property knownas its electronegativity, which gives a qualitative estimateof the level of polarity of a bond. Electronegativity is characterized as thecapability of an atom in a molecule to entice electrons to itself. The conceptof an electronegativity range for the aspects was proposed by Pauling. The electron affinity of an atom provides a directmeasure of the ability of an atom to lure and bind an electron:
*
*
where AX denotes the electron affinityof atom X. For the reactions of 2 aspects, X and Y, with totally free electrons,the relative values of the electron affinities AXand also AY provide a meacertain of theloved one independent tendencies of X and also Y to readjust into X-and Y-. However before, we are interested in the reaction of X with
Y and in being able to predict whether the X�Y bond will certainly be polar in thesense X+Y- or X-Y+. The electronwhich is to be partly or wholly gained by X or Y is not a totally free electronbut is bound to the atom Y or X respectively. Consequently we are interestedin the family member energies of the following two processes:
(1)
*
*
(2)
*
*
For reactivity (1) to be favoured overreaction (2), not just have to Y havea high electron affinity, it is likewise necessary that X have actually a low ionizationpotential. We would expect the bonding electrons to be approximately equallyshared in the X�Y bond, if DE1= DE2,as neither extreme framework is favoured over the various other. Hence the conditionfor a non-polar covalent bond is
(3)
*
or, collecting quantities for a offered atom on one side of the equation,
(4)
*
Equation (4) says that a non-polarbond will certainly outcome once the difference between the ionization potential andthe electron affinity is the very same for both atoms joined by the bond. Ifthe amount IX - AXis greater than IY - AY,then the product X-Y+ will certainly be energetically favouredover X+Y-. Therefore the quantity (I - A)gives a meacertain of the capacity of an atom to lure electrons (or electroniccharge density) to itself relative to some various other atom. Theelectronegativity, delisted by the symbol c,is characterized to be proportional to this quantity:
*
The electronegativities of the elements in the initially few rows of the periodictable are given in Table 7-5.Table 7-5.Some Electronegativity Values
H
2.1
LiBeBCNOP
1.01.52.02.53.06.54.0
NaMgAlSiPSCl
0.91.21.51.82.12.53.0
KCaBr
0.81.02.8
As meant, the electronegativity increases from leftto appropriate across a provided row of the periodic table and decreases down agiven column. The higher the distinction in the electronegativity valuesfor 2 atoms, the higher should be the disparity in the level to whichthe bond thickness is common in between the 2 atoms. Pauling has provided empiricalexpressions which relate the electronegativity distinction between 2 elementsto the dipole minute and to the toughness of the bond. The interested readeris described Pauling"s book detailed at the finish of this chapter.
*
*
*
*